Suppliers

Dual Sourcing: The Strategy

Dual sourcing secures procurement by relying on two suppliers. Principle, advantages, when to adopt it in an SME, and the mistake to avoid.

Dual sourcing means procuring the same component or material from two suppliers rather than one. The goal isn't to complicate purchasing, but to secure supply: if one supplier fails (a shortage, a price increase, a quality issue, or a geographic disruption), the other steps in. Dual sourcing is insurance against dependence on a single point of failure.

What dual sourcing delivers

The strategy offers three main benefits. It reduces the risk of a shortage if a supplier fails. It strengthens your negotiating position by avoiding total dependence on a single partner. And it provides an ongoing basis for comparing price, quality, and service. In return, it requires qualifying and monitoring two suppliers, and it splits volumes, which sometimes means lower economies of scale.

So dual sourcing isn't a universal recipe, but a trade-off. The real question isn't “one supplier or two?” in the abstract, but “for which items is the cost of a second supplier justified by the risk avoided?” For a critical component with no quick alternative, the extra cost of security easily pays for itself. For a commodity item available everywhere, it adds nothing. In practice, this means sorting items into those that need the security of two sources and those that a single, well-managed supplier serves perfectly well.

When to adopt dual sourcing in an SME

Dual sourcing is mainly justified for critical items: those whose shortage would stop production or delivery. For these SKUs, the security is worth its cost. For ordinary items that are easy to find elsewhere, a single, well-managed supplier can be enough. Deciding where to dual-source and where not to belongs to the “decision” layer of the Two-Layer Model: it's a risk trade-off, made upstream, that purchasing then applies consistently. This kind of targeted trade-off is at the heart of supply chain risk management.

The common mistake

The most frequent mistake is believing that having two suppliers on file is enough. If the second one has never actually produced for you, isn't qualified, or can't ramp up volume quickly, dual sourcing is only an illusion of security. A second supplier only protects you if the relationship is actively maintained: regular orders, verified quality, and confirmed capacity. The other trap is dual-sourcing the entire product range out of caution, which spreads effort thin and raises costs without targeting the real risk.

Assess your supplier exposure

Want to identify your critical points of dependence? Our forty-five-minute free 45-minute session assesses your supplier exposure, with no commitment.

Frequently asked questions

What is dual sourcing?

It's procuring the same item from two suppliers rather than one, in order to secure supply.

What are the advantages of dual sourcing?

It reduces the risk of a shortage, strengthens your negotiating position, and provides an ongoing basis for comparing price, quality, and service.

Should every item be dual-sourced?

No. Dual sourcing is mainly justified for critical items whose shortage would stop production or delivery, not for the entire product range.

Insights

Also worth reading.

Bring your figures. Leave with a plain answer.

A free 45-minute session with a senior practitioner. Free, no commitment.

Book a free session